Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Nationalists need to fight the gender war AKA feminism

I truly believe that if men and women wielded a fair balance of power against each other, then everything will eventually sort itself out.

The Chinese have a concept of this struggle, and it is the idea of Yin and Yang.

Those of you who are racial nationalists may scorn the wisdom of other nations, civilisations and races, but I believe that any wise leader would not scorn to use the wisdoms of others if it means the ultimate betterment of their own race and nation.

After all, the stealing of other people's military secrets and strategies is considered patriotic.

My ideological strategy is in fact very simple.

Reduce everything to gender politics, which is the cause of the Western malaise anyway, IMHO.

Once men understand that all feminism has had to offer them is the promise of cheap sex from immoral and stupid women who make bad reproductive decisions to the detriment of their race, nation and civilisation to distract them from the injustice and insanity of the matriarchy, then the whole rotten edifice of feminism will collapse.

It can be done, it should be done, and it must be done WITHIN OUR LIFETIMES.

Most people do not care about foreign policy because they don't think they can (a) do anything about it or (b) understand its ramifications, so they become apathetic.

But if you talk about sex and gender relations, then everyone cares, because everyone has dealings and bargains with members of the opposite sex, and ought to be concerned about their old age and the future of their children.

Teen pregnancy *rate* lowest since 1969

Pregnancy rates in under 20s are going down, but there has been a sharp rise in the over 40s

There was something about this on Woman's Hour today at

It basically said that we should rejoice because teen pregnancies are down to its lowest RATE OF INCREASE in the last 40 years.

There is sharp rise of in over 40s pregnancy rates however.

Great.  So we'll have more singly-parented IVF fertilised weaklings, Down's syndrome children and children birth abnormalities that is the problem of being an older mother being a drain on the NHS.   I suppose it could be said to be good news that stupid schoolgirl sluts who didn't pay attention in their sex education classes are not getting knocked up at quite the same rate as before.

Or maybe we have just reached the absolute limit on the numbers of stupid schoolgirl sluts who will let anyone fuck and forget them.

Only morons would take this as a sign of improvement.

How many SSMs were there in 1969 and what was the percentage of SSMs then?

How many SSMs are there now and what is percentage of SSMs now?

Come on BBC, you can tell us, but you won't, because you are a shitting stinking fucking pissing BASTARD Broadcasting Corporation for the Matriarchy that makes licence fee payers pay for propaganda against themselves.

Men should know that if they use their sex organ as their thinking organ, their brains, race, nation and civilisation will just turn to SHIT.

Too bad for you if you are too shit for brains not to have worked this out for yourselves earlier.

That story has been the best demonstration of "lies, damned statistics and lies" so far.

You should all be ashamed of yourselves if you hadn't spotted this earlier.

The male ego is a fragile thing and needs to be wrapped in cotton wool by women

The male ego is a fragile thing, perhaps even more fragile than the female ego.

The female at least has the option of talking about her emotions with her female friends.  This is not open to men, because we know that any display by a man of his weakness to his peers would result in loss of status.  As for displaying weakness to women, that would be even more disastrous.  

While it is easy to get sex with women of their own age, they actually want their women to be less sexually experienced, and not say things like "My last lover was so much more experienced and gave me so much more pleasure than you" and that kind of thing, which is devastating to men, especially if they are dumped because of that.

I think that is the reason why you get more men who are paedophiles these days.

On the whole, men prefer their women to be passive and appreciative and not be showing off all the tricks in bed they have learnt in their long, promiscuous and varied sex life.

Because most women - even under-aged teenage schoolgirls - are already sexually experienced - men find themselves having to go younger and younger for the kind of passive appreciation and inexperience they crave for.

The reason why men prefer blonds is that blond hair is something children have, which would suggest that men deep down prefer their women to be like children so they can assert authority over them.  

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

British Nationalists think nothing of exposing themselves to women in their cars

Shocking, but true.

No one in the BNP is even saying that the Sunday Star story is untrue, and the Chairman himself has not seen fit to deny the story.

So it must be true.

Many white British men think it is a non-story because that is how most British men really behave, BNP or not.

Why do they behave like that?

Is it cos most white women are sluts?  

Offering a white woman the opportunity to suck them your cock is as unremarkable as offering to buy her a drink, apparently.

If she says no and looks disgusted, you merely sigh, roll your eyes, put it back in your trousers, and carry on as if nothing had happened.

If people make a fuss about it, you just ignore them, and everyone in your party will say you were led on by a slapper.

If she really was the slapper everyone is saying she is she would have sucked it, I imagine, rather than sell her story. 

Another possible version:

"As it happened, I did expose myself to her.  Since she herself asked me to do so, I thought it would be rude to refuse, even if I am in fact a very happily married man.  She eagerly and skilfully performed the sex act in question and seemed to enjoy this rare privilege.  I have no idea why she is now complaining now as it was all her idea in the first place.  Why, on 30 September 2011 she even called me a 'true superhero' on Facebook."

Even if we gave Nick Griffin the benefit of the doubt that the ex-model led him on ....

The response of BNP men was very interesting.  No one actually said,

"Get away with you!  The very idea!  Our Chairman would never do such a thing as expose his tumescent member to a female party activist who came to  his rescue in her Jeep, because we all know that he is a gentleman as well a very happily married man whom we are sure would have no problem getting his wife to do such things for him."

What the BNP men have been saying without exception is that the ex-model must have led him on, and by implication any of them would inevitably have succumbed to such a temptation by such a temptress.

If Claudia were to drive up to each of their homes in her Jeep, suggest they buy her a curry in Swanley which they will consume in her vehicle in a car park, they would without exception accede to this.  They would all get out their cocks for her after she has "led them on", even as they are armed with the knowledge of what happened to their esteemed Chairman with this ex-model in her Jeep.

It would just be like a porno version of Groundhog Day.

If the Chairman had been led on by the ex-model, his statement would look more like this:

"It was Claudia who told me to have my cock out ready for her when she came back from the litter bin after she had disposed of the remains of our curry lunch.  As it happened, when she came back, she took one look at me and suggested that I might like to get out of the car to walk my lunch off, with a rather disapproving expression on her face.  I then realised she had only been joking, took the hint, had a little walk until my excitement had subsided sufficiently, and got back into the car.  We never referred to the incident again.  Anyone who knows Claudia would know that she has a manner that could be described as provocative and flirtatious.  I think, after my near death experience that day, I might be allowed a little leeway.  The balance of my mind had been upset by my car flipping over like that on the motorway, and the curry we got from the Swanley Tandoori seemed to have aphrodisiac qualities, and it seemed to me that Claudia was being particularly flirtatious and suggestive to me that day, probably because of my brush with death.   She is very tactile and is perhaps unaware of the effect she has on most men.  Or perhaps she does, and it amuses her to tease men in this way.  I can only apologise to my wife, my family and the party for letting them down."

Perhaps such an admission might make the Chairman look slightly better, instead of his very guilty siilence.

Monday, 27 February 2012

Was the WOMAN who victimised Fireman Sam WHITE?

A pillar of the community: The popular Fireman Sam cartoon was created by David Jones who was accused of racism

Read more:

Even if the ex-model *did* lead the BNP Chairman on ....

Even if the ex-model had led the Chairman on, it would be good to hear his version of things. If he had not exposed himself to her one would expect an outright denial, since he was with her on 30 September 2011, and cannot deny it. But he does not even have the sense to do that.

If it was just her word against his, then it would make sense for him to do that, even if the allegation is true. It is very cynical of me to say this, of course, but I think I would have made a good Director of Communications for the BNP.

Perhaps the Chairman thinks the story will go away, which calls into question his lack of integrity, judgement and his lack of access to good advice, as well as his ability to persuade his wife to perform the sex act that he was alleged to have asked the ex-model to perform on him.

If he thinks the story will just go away, I think he is very much mistaken about the nature of the British public, whom we all know are obsessed about sex. The picture of an excited Chairman and a disgusted ex-model will remain longer in the mind of the British public than any Panorama programme about financial irregularity.

This story also gives a very bad impression of British men. Either they are so boorish as to expect their women to perform sex acts on them in car parks after a clearing up the remains of a takeaway curry consumed in the car, or British women are indeed so cheap that they regularly do this sort of thing to make British men think that such behaviour is acceptable.

I do believe the time has now come to discuss the sexual mores of the British nation, and whether the cheapness of British women (Jack Straw described white women as "easy meat" is in fact leading to the increasingly noticeable degeneracy of the indigenous British.

Perhaps that is why successive British governments have conspired to let in foreigners to do the work that the white working classes are no longer fit for, because of the degeneracy brought on by the cheapness of their women.

I have never got over the shock of how a party that is supposed to promote the interests of the white race does not even have the basics of racial health and hygiene to promote family values supported by marriage, and that I was expelled from the party for offending a never married mother with illegitimate and disabled offspring and another woman who had clearly made a bad reproductive choice, when she already knew she had Multiple Sclerosis 11 years ago, but nevertheless went on to have a severely disabled child, now 7, and was rattling her begging bowl at the British taxpayer.

We know who is in power by whom we cannot criticise, and it is clearly the case that the never married mother and the women who make bad reproductive choices hold the whip hand over the British political establishment.

Sunday, 26 February 2012

Sexual promiscuity costing UK billions of pounds

Promiscuity has a direct financial cost as STIs are estimated to cost the NHS more than £1 billion per year. Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) in England rose 74% cent between 1998 and 2009.

Teenage pregnancies cost the NHS £63 million per year.

The abortion rate continues to rise. The total number of abortions in England and Wales rose by 8% between 2000 and 2010.96% of abortions are paid for by the NHS, at a cost of £118 million per year.

Family breakdown
Family breakdown, including divorce and separation, directly costs the taxpayer an average of £42 billion per year, most of which comes from the cost of tax credits, lone parent benefits, housing benefits and the health, crime and educational impact of relationship breakdown.  

This sum, nearly £1,400 per year for every taxpayer, is equivalent to 6% of all public spending for 2011.

Fucking Sluts!!!!!! Fucking feminists!!!!!

Why do British men just take it lying down?

Cos they are fucking sluts [pun intended] and are the running dogs of feminists, have no pride and feel no shame.

British "men" are so fucking useless that they don't mind being fucked over and then turned over to be fucked up the arse.

All they can do is think of the next free blowjob, like Nick Griffin, apparently ....

Friday, 24 February 2012

CRB check is a tax on business imposed by feminists who are BAD FOR BRITISH BUSINESS and FAMILIES

Crime checks for a million community volunteers as vetting spirals out of control, say critics

Read more:

Apparently, if your child is in secondary school and want to do a French exchange scheme, say, your entire family would have to have a CRB check.

I had previously thought this would apply on to those in your family over 18, but not so, according to

So, you and your partner (if you are not a single mum) would have to have a CRB check.

However, if that child has a father who is Muslim and has 4 wives, 5 CRB checks would be required.

If each of these wives had 4 children then they would presumably need to have CRB checks too. After all the two little bastards who tortured to death Jamie Bulger for their entertainment were only 11 and the age of criminal responsibility is 10.

Your children might abuse your French exchange guest either physically or sexually so they would need a CRB check too.

And what if you have a lodger? He or she may be a paedo too, as well as you, your partner, your partner's other partners and your partner's partners' offspring who may share the same home as you and have access to that hypothetical French exchange student ....

Also, this system favours the single mum and penalises the married person whose spouse is still living with him/her.

This is the SHIT you get when you let feminists run your government. Feminism leads to paedophilia and the Paedophile Tax.

How Feminism causes Paedophilia is explained at

Feminism is SHIT and feminism is the shit they make British children learn at schools.

What is feminism? It is about creating SSMs, not criticising them, allowing homosexuals to "marry" each other and fining B&B owners for not wanting to do business with them.

Who represents feminism? Why, ALL the political parties, including the BNP who are too fucking thick to recognise that feminism is the antithesis of family values (which can only be supported by reintroducing fault into divorce), and that marriage is eugenic

They are too afraid of the sluts of their own race and prefer to whinge about Muslims and foreigners instead.

Sadly, they have no real racial pride or they would actually be ashamed of the way their women behave.

Instead of British men condemning Fiona McKeown (whom I would argue should have been charged with arranging and facilitating under-aged sex for her daughter when she arrived home), sympathy was given to her when she claimed that the death of her daughter - left in the care of her boyfriend who was an Indian tourist guide they had met while on holiday by her mother - should and could have been prevented by the Goan police.

It is all too despicable and contemptible.   Indeed, a BNP activist even agreed with me that this should have been done, and then backtracked.

When a party that is supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race cannot practice the basics of health and hygiene nor have the moral courage to discuss ways of preventing degeneracy in their own race, you know the white race is fucked.

Feminism is SHIT and don't you forget it, but don't expect the BNP to agree with me.  Most of them are hoping to get sex from SSMs so they won't be seen to be saying anything to offend them any time soon.   

Thursday, 23 February 2012

Eugenic reasons why a man should choose his woman and why women should not be sluts

"A man should choose his woman."

This was what Temujin's father conceded to him when Temujin decided he wanted a wife other than the one chosen for him.

All real men should always choose their female partners, but it is the case that these days most men just sit around  looking pretty, and they will eventually be picked up by a woman impatient to find a male partner.

Because feminism allows women to make the first move, men find that it is easier to just wait for the female to make the first move.

Most men are afraid of REJECTION, you see. Therefore, the cautious man will just wait for the offers of sex from impatient single and looking women to arrive. Some even target not particularly attractive women who are only good for one-off sex, because they think she is less likely to say no than someone more attractive but more likely to say no.

However, women who offer no-strings sex to timid men afraid of rejection are doing themselves no favours because timid men are by definition sub-alpha.

They may be confident that the timid sub-alpha male would not decline sex from them, but what they have got is a sub standard kind of man - a timid kind of man who does not even like her enough or have the courage to make the first move or a man with meagre financial resources who cannot afford to entice her with the quality of his hospitality and entertainment.

Women shouldn't be seen to choose their men and must go through the motions of manipulating him into making the first move.

This is because even if the man you have reluctantly decided to settle on is a sub alpha too stupid, scared and skint to make the first move, you still have to make him feel dominant or you will end up bullying him and attacking his masculinity even more, reducing him to an utter wreck which will make you despise him even more.

This may in time tempt you into adultery, leading to the break-up of your marriage, to the disadvantage of your offspring.

If enough women do this sort of thing (which they already do) it will lead to the qualitative deterioration of the next generation (which it already has).

It has been said that it only takes a stupid woman to manage a clever man, but a clever woman to manage a stupid man.

That is why men need to be more masculine, for the good of their society and their nation. To make most men seem more alpha - because, let's face it, most of them are not that up to being alpha - women have to become more feminine.  Secretly, most men are afraid of women, because they know they cannot resist an offer of apparently no-strings sex, and, if they fall in love, they can end up having their feelings very hurt.  Yes, it is risky, and, a life of biting your tongue does not sound very appealing to the modern sexually liberated female who has a career and speaks her mind, but these are the sacrifices we must make to make Britain a stronger nation whose people are mostly rational, resourceful and robust rather than illegitimate, innumerate and illiterate, disabled, mentally deficient and autistic with behavioural, mental health and substance abuse problems who are a burden on the taxpayer.

The clever woman would need the self-control to restrain herself from speaking her mind to her stupid husband so as not to attack his masculinity while manipulating him into doing the thing she wants him to do.

There is always the nuclear option. "You are not a man at all, are you, because a man would do [the thing I want you to do for me that you don't want to do that I am trying to make you do]" That is usually quite devastating.

He can always argue that not doing the thing required and desired of him is not unmanly, but rather prudent and foresightful, because etc.

Many men think feminism is cheaper because these days women are expected to pay their own way while allowing their male partners sexual access to them. But not in the long run, because your entire civilisation pays the price.

By encouraging females to choose their male partners carefully the quality of the next generation goes up.

Allowing females to make bad reproductive choices while fearing to challenge them because of the supremacy of feminism has caused the quality of masculinity and the next generation to deteriorate alarmingly in our lifetimes.

High crime, low standards of behaviour and educational standards is entirely due to the fact most British women are cheap and easy.

res ipsa loquitur.

However, the BNP - a party that you would have thought would care about the quality of the next generation of white people - actually expelled me for trying to point this out, because their membership consists mostly of the illegitimate and the parents of illegitimate children whom they are afraid of offending.

If the BNP themselves are incapable of supporting family values, just like the LibLabCon, then Britain's descent down its slippery slope to decline and extinction continues apace.

There is a strange irony that it takes a female and a foreigner to point this out to an entire country that seems to be conspiring to appear not to understand what is after all only common sense in order to avoid having to deal with its implications.

The implication is of course that feminism (which condones female promiscuity and protects women from the consequences of their actions) is bad for Britain.

I would be quite happy to be interviewed by an entire panel of Jeremy Paxmans, but no one in the BBC dares to even discuss it, precisely because they know that the moment it is discussed, all I need do is give Liberal Feminism a firm gentle push for the whole stinking rotten matriarchal edifice to come crashing down.  That is why they block me from following them on Twitter and pretend I do not exist.

But it is only a matter of time before one of them breaks ranks.

Nationalists should know that Liberalism and Feminism - ideologies that desecrate that institutions of Marriage and Family are anti-Eugenic.   Christianity has joined forces with Liberalism and Feminism now, because the Church is stuffed with Communists, Liberals and Feminists now.   Only Islam is Eugenic, because only Islam promotes family values supported by marriage in theory and in practice.

But Nationalists are afraid of discussing eugenics these days, because they are mostly stupid, scared, ignorant and think eugenics is about doing what Hitler did.   That is another sign of matriarchal degeneracy, by the way.   Eugenics as far as I am concerned, is about reconsecrating the institution of Marriage, but they are all too slut and bastard to understand this now.   

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Cameron and LibLabCon attempt to engage the female vote

The reason why the LibLabCon is always courting the female vote is because they think most women are gullible promiscuous welfare-claiming parasites and therefore easier to bribe with benefits and more stupid intrusive totalitarian laws to stop their feelings from being hurt.

Why don't they court the male vote for a change?  

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

Single Mums are a degree ABOVE grandparents

Jane Jackson, a grandmother tells Yasmin Alibhai Brown how her ex-daughter had her revenge on her ex-mother-in-law when she withheld contact between her 11 year old daughter (whom she has not seen for 4 years) and her ex-husband and by extension her paternal grandparents.

Shut the fuck up if you have a shit daughter-in-law. Don't you dare criticise her or she will shit on you by depriving you of all contact with all your grandchildren that that son of yours has had by her when she divorces your son, even if he has done nothing wrong, and takes half his stuff.  If you have given your son half his stuff, you will have given half your stuff to that evil bitch of an ex-daughter-in-law who will deprive you of your grandchildren.

What do you think that evil bitch of an ex-daughter-in-law might do?

Well, she might let your grand-daughter have sex or even under-aged sex under the former matrimonial home of your son, and even let her get knocked up, again and again and again ...

What a lovely thought, eh?

Yep, shut THE FUCK UP, granny and grandpa if you don't like your daughter-in-law and she does stupid, vicious things.  Bite your tongue.

Are you really surprised that no wisdom now gets passed on from old to young, in our debased, depraved and degraded nation?

All truth and wisdom is considered offensive to the foolish and ignorant, don't you know, and the young are no longer expected to respect their elders and betters by taking criticism meekly and politely.

Honour killing begins to make some sense to me now.

Monday, 20 February 2012

Secularists impose their values on the religious

Why does no one get it that the Secularists are imposing their values on the religious?

Obviously the Secularists are imposing their values on the religious if the Holy Books say homosexuality is an abomination and the secularists are talking about gay marriage.

Obviously the Secularists are imposing their values on the religious if the Holy Books say extramarital sex is a sin and the taxpayer is compelled to pay for Slut Single Mums to have bastards at their expense and not allowed to complain about this in polite society.

Obviously the Secularists are imposing their values on the religious if the Holy Books say usury and gambling is forbidden and the ones who do that most and best are the ones who control these secular governments. (They are now called Technocrats.)

Wake up, people, wake up.

You don't have to believe in God to instinctively know that gay marriage is wrong.

You don't have to believe in God to know that encouraging Slut Single Mums to breed bastards at taxpayer expense is wrong.

You don't have to believe in God to know that compound interest will keep you in servitude for the rest of your life if you were previously unaware of the wisdom of "neither a borrower nor a lender be".

You don't have to believe in God to know that compulsive gambling and drinking is not good for you.

Perhaps we do though, or most of us need to pay lip service to a belief in God in order to observe these rules in a meaningful sense.

You can have a religion without God and our supreme religion now is SECULARISM. Secularism means disobeying the Commandments of God.   Whatever God says we should do the Secularists will not do, and whatever God says we should not do, the Secularists will give licence to.   If God is supposed to be good, then Secularists are clearly the anti-Christ.

I propose a Secular government that follows the commandments of God without requiring a belief in God.   I may be an atheist, but I see the point of ostracising Slut Single Mums, not gambling, not being intoxicated, not allowing the concept of marriage to be hijacked by same-sex couples who already have the civil partnership which confers upon them the rights of a married couple against each other.   They are the ones who are being totalitarian because they are the ones who insist on changing the meaning of word "marriage" in that sinister Orwellian way of theirs.

Wake up, people, wake up, and look your matriarchal oppressor in the eye and say you are not taking any more crap.   Cameron, Clegg and Miliband are only their butler, head gardener and coachman.   The people who these days control them are the Slut Single Mums who make up more than 50% of the mothers of babies born in Britain these days.  We know who is in power by those we cannot criticise.

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Without prostitutes men have no protection from what is in effect FORCED MARRIAGE for more photos of Hollywood actors who get their sex for FREE from their female fans and who don't need to go to a prostitute.

I think prostitution is an honest profession. More honest than getting knocked up and getting the CSA pursue the father of the illegitimate child who never wanted to be a father in the first place.

For this reason, I am proposing that men should treat known prostitutes as a degree above the Slut Single Mum.  If he wants to give up to his seat to a woman, for example, he should offer it to the prostitute first.  Only if the prostitute declines should he offer it to the Slut Single Mum and there is no other woman who is not an SSM in the vicinity who might want that seat.

Criminalising prostitution is a like women ganging up on men and saying "You have to marry us (or support an illegitimate baby you never intended to father) if you want to have sex with us."

That is what it really boils down to.

By the way, prostitution and by extension brothel-keeping is tolerated in the Koran.

Just think: the Koran is more tolerant of prostitution than feminists!

Men, if you want sex from a prostitute, you know the full price and the cost of any extras.

If you accept no-strings sex from a woman who knows where you live and work and is careless about contraception you will find yourself paying for that child you never intended to father until it is 16 or finishes full time education.

Why should a man who only wanted sex have to pay to maintain a child until it is financially independent if he never even wanted to have a child in the first place?

Why should women who think that every men who has sex with them wants to father and maintain a child be rewarded for this sluttish behaviour?

All sluts are by definition STUPID, by the way, and a stupid slut is a pleonasm, like "tuna fish" since a tuna can only be a fish, and a slut can only be stupid.

What happens to a nation who is ruled by the morals stupid sluts I have no idea, but it can't be a pretty picture.  Something nastily Biblical, probably.

By tolerating SSMs you are just encouraging stupid people to breed criminal bastards who will eventually drag your entire civilisation down into the sewer. Such brothels would help the British with their balance of payments and put slut single mums to work.

I am not suggesting that all SSMs should become prostitutes since they are not all desirable.

The rest can do the lower paid jobs like cleaning, security, book-keeping, catering, beauty, health and fitness and perhaps even mind the illegitimate children of SSMs in creches and nurseries.

Most foreign women who end up in brothels in this country knew full well that that was what they came here to do.  Feminists pretend they care about the exploitation of these vulnerable women when all they want to do is to keep out the competition and kick them out of the country in just the way some members of anti-immigration parties want to kick out foreigners who come here to take the bread out of their mouths.

You see, getting what you think is no-strings sex from a slut does not give you transparent pricing.

The man may think he is getting a free fuck but if she knows where he lives and works, his CSA goose is cooked.

Sex with a slut is one of those things that you are told is free but full of hidden charges.

There is NOTHING wrong with prostitution.  A wife is just a prostitute with a long-term exclusive contract with more onerous duties, and a husband is just a punter with a long-term exclusive contract with more onerous financial duties.



The CRB check is a Paedophile Tax

Not a Paedo?  Then why are you paying it?  Cos you have SHIT for brains and your matriarchal government has SHIT for brains.

Apparently, if your child is in secondary school and want to do a French exchange scheme, say, your entire family would have to have a CRB check.

I had previously thought this would apply on to those in your family over 18, but not so, according to

So, you and your partner (if you are not a single mum) would have to have a CRB check.

However, if that child has a father who is Muslim and has 4 wives, 5 CRB checks would be required.

If each of these wives had 4 children then they would presumably need to have CRB checks too.

Your children might abuse your French exchange guest either physically or sexually so they would need a CRB check too.

After all the two little bastards who tortured to death Jamie Bulger for their entertainment were only 11 and the age of criminal responsibility is 10.

Also, this system favours the single mum and penalises the married person whose spouse is still living with him or her.

This is the SHIT you get when you let feminists run your government. Feminism leads to paedophilia and the Paedophile Tax.

Feminism is SHIT and feminism is the shit they make British children learn at schools.

What is feminism? It is about creating SSMs, not criticising them, tolerating homosexuals, allowing them to marry each other and fining B&B owners for not wanting to do business with them.

Who represents feminism? Why, ALL the political parties, including the BNP (whom you would expect to have some idea of the basics of racial health and hygiene because they used to promote family values, but the female partners of most of BNP members are SSMs these days, and those who do not have partners know they cannot afford a wife and are hoping to have no-strings sex from an SSM). mentions how most single mums expect to be fucked and forgotten, and won't make too much of a fuss.

Feminism is SHIT and don't you forget it.


They pay up because their brains have been turned to SHIT, their guts turned to piss and their balls turned to mince by feminism.

Don't expect the men of Britain to say anything though.  They are just women with penis extensions.  You can't do anything with these useless effeminate emasculated bastards because British men feel no shame in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

And what if you have a lodger? He or she may be a paedo too, as well as you, your partner, your partner's other partners and your partner's partners' offspring who may share the same home as you and have physical and sexual access to that hypothetical French exchange student ....

Is there a French equivalent of the CRB?

If not, why not?

Don't they have a paedo problem like Britain?

If not, why not?

Why are French children better behaved than Anglo Saxon ones?

Why are French mothers better than British mothers?

Why are French men sexier than British men?

Why are French women sexier than British women?

Is it because British women are cheaper than French women?

Why do the French have Marine Le Pen but the British Nick Griffin?

Friday, 10 February 2012

Probable super-injunction by the Matriarchy has suspended Twitter account of Fathers4Justice

F4J twitter account suspended soon after this interview of Matt O'Connor on the Today Programme took place.

Find out more from:!/MattGOConnor!/NadineOC

When I tweeted yesterday

1party4all Claire Khaw
Will someone tell me why #F4J twitter account has been suspended?

@Will2403!/Will2403 responded:

@1party4all that's a hashtag not an account. And the answer is 'cos they were associating with the likes of crazy bints like you'

I have no idea what he means though and no response so far to my request for an explanation:

1party4all Claire Khaw
@Will2403 What? Explain, please.

Arms and representatives of the Matriarchy:


You won't give a shit about any of this unless and until your wife divorces you and decides she doesn't want your children to see you any more, because it is all too upsetting and inconvenient.

1 and 3 marriages end in divorce, so if you are married with children be careful about getting on the wrong side of her.

Even if you do not get on the wrong side of her she can just decide that you are just too fat, farty, old and boring and that she would like to live in the matrimonial home without you getting under her feet.

If you are not married to the wife of your children you have virtually no rights.

If you are married, you are supposed to have more rights than fathers of illegitimate offspring (who have virtually no rights), but the family courts of the matriarchy in the UK that are held in camera (which means there are reporting restrictions on the proceedings of these secret courts that allow your children to be taken from you without good reason) means that in practice she can mess you around.  Court orders can be applied for and granted, and she still gets the fuck away with it, and you will be a poorer and more bitter man and one of the sad losers who have to go cap in hand to F4J, who are also in turn kicked around by the Matriarchy.

Yep, these women and people who think like them are running the country into the ground, making the male taxpayer pay for their lifestyle choices of irresponsible, stupid and malicious women, pay to create a new generation of women like them, and a new generation of scared, stupid, skint men like you.

Get used to it, and carry on eating SHIT, loser.

Or join
DECLARE AN OFFICIAL MARRIAGE AND SEX STRIKE!  (You don't have to be contemplating marriage to join.  It just a group for people who agree that it would be a good tactical move to say men should not get married until they get a better deal.  If this happened women would declare a sex strike and the human race would die out, but if terms were renegotiated, the strikes would be called off.  Simple, really!)

MARRIAGE CONTRACT CLUB (This means all marriages under this system would have to have a marriage contract so that blame can be apportioned in cases of breach of contract.   Under this system  the rule is that children under 7 live with mum.  After 7 they live with dad leaving mum to find a new man with no "baggage".  There will be exceptions of course if mum is abusive or dad has died, scarpered, is doing time or is just unsuitable to assume the role of a responsible parent.)

Thursday, 9 February 2012

A very basic illustration of why Feminism/Liberalism is Anti-Eugenic

Eugenics is the "applied science or the bio-social movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at improving the genetic composition of a population", usually referring to the manipulation of human populations.

There is a race, say, the Purple Race.

You separate them into two random gender-balanced groups.

After separation, you tell one group that they must on no account have extramarital sex and God will punish them if they do.

You tell the other group they can have any kind of sex with anyone they like at any age because there is no God and all that matters is that they have fun before they die.

You come back later in 100 years' time to see what has happened to them.

Which group do you think will do better, all things being equal?

Remember: the purpose of marriage is eugenic.

The Lily-Livered Libertarian Philip Booth of the Institute of Economic Affairs

Philip Booth - the lily-livered libertarian who let the side down because he was afraid of  Dame Jenni, Grand Matriarch of Britain

"A report out today says British women are facing a shockingly high price for motherhood as they are forced into lower skilled, part-time work after having children. Joining Jenni are Vidhya Alakeson from the Resolution Foundation and author of report out today, and Professor Philip Booth, an economist and director at the Institute of Economic Affairs."

My thoughts as I heard Philip Booth on Woman's Hour.   (Do men who go on Woman's Hour become women while they speak, I wonder.)

"Child care costs have rocketed", says Philip. "Extraordinarily expensive even after subsidies," he went on to say.

Oh come on, Philip, SAY IT, SAY IT, SAY IT, say that mothers with young children should not be working.

Why train women to be engineers if they are just going to take maternity leave and inconvenience their employers? Employers might as well hire men who can afford to support their wives to stay at home looking after their children without sending them out to work.

Nope. He didn't say it. Philip didn't say it at all. Why are British men such incorrigible PUSSIES?

I wonder why Philip didn't suggest repealing the Equality Act.

Does he think he might be sacked from his part-time job at Brighton University then, if he dared to say anything as HERETICAL and libertarian as that?

Would Dame Jenni have given him the same treatment as she meted out to poor Oliver James when he suggested that working mothers might harm the development of their young children?

Perhaps he was afraid of being told off by Dame Jenni because he is a frightened little boy rather than a man who is supposedly a libertarian with a message to give to the Grande Dame Matriarch that is Dame Jenni. 

Most white liberal middle class men are the perfect illustration of the term "lily-livered". 

The awful thing is that they actually feel no shame about their cowardice and you can't get them to do anything. Libertarian men, especially, really are beyond contempt. is a list of tweeters who have blocked me from following their tweets.  Quite a few of them are libertarian men, eg Tim Aker, Simon Richards, Guido Fawkes, James Delingpole.

Did they do that because of my BNP associations (I haven't got a racist bone in my body unless wanting to help the white working classes is racist) or because I have dared to challenge the Matriarchy and they fear guilt by association?

How SSMs can make men pay them to fuck up their society IN JUST ONE GENERATION

No more job creation schemes for social workers (mostly women like Annie the Social Worker in help the dregs of humanity to survive and make your country a worse place and make the taxpayer pay to make the country a worse place.

If parents want to kill their children let them. Why? Because parents who kill their children should never have had children in the first place. (Actually, it is not "parents", is it? We are really talking about SLUT SINGLE MUMS here.) Let the problem solve itself.

Or you will have damaged children growing into violent criminals burgling your home and raping your daughters and your wife and maybe killing them and you.  Or perhaps just being antisocial and pissing in your garden and killing your cat.   

Do you get it yet, British male taxpayer?


That is why you and your country are FUCKED.

The BNP don't get it that SSMs are bad for Britain either because they can only talk about immigration and Muslims and are afraid of their women. 

Most of their male members have female partners who are SSMs. 

Most of their male members have mothers who are SSMs. 

Most of their female members are SSMs.

Most of their male members are hoping to get sex from an SSM (because most women you meet these days are SSMs now).  If they say anything against SSMs they won't be getting any sex and they are too poor and mean to pay for the services of an honest prostitute.

That is why they are fucked too.

This is why the promiscuous female is reviled and despised in any society that is rational and moral.   

The subjugation of men to the morals of the worst women can easily be achieved in one generation if most women give men with no-strings sex and most men accept, even just once.  

Once most babies born in your society are bastards - and they already are- it is pretty much fucked until and unless remedial action is taken ASAP.  

Is it being taken ASAP?  Is it fuck.   

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

"There is a girl on Facebook ... " or The Evil of a Promiscuous Woman

There is a [white girl] girl on Facebook called X.  She doesn't like blokes wearing condoms and she got pregnant by a Jamaican bloke who has done a runner.  She has given away the baby away for adoption as it ruined her social life.  And she used to be respectable.  She has a degree.  I [a white male BNP buddy of mine] even offered to be the father as I don't care that the baby is black but it seems like she doesn't want any help.  Pure evil."

She went with a black bloke because I had an Asian girlfriend.  And she still thought I was racist for uploading BNP videos. I think she wanted to  spite me.  She had unprotected sex with black men to prove she wasn't racist.  The world is going mad.

If I had a million pounds ....

If I had a million pounds I would offer it as prize money to any card-carrying feminist who makes the best case against feminism.

I would love to award the prize to Suzanne Moore, my favourite feminist, who was once my Facebook friend, but who has now blocked me on Twitter and is telling everyone who will listen to her to block me and who will also be judging the Orwell Prize for blogging (which I have been entering since 2010), together with another judge with Labour associations Hopi Sen.

This is just my pathetic little attempt to bribe her with my thought present of £1,000,000.  Otherwise, I know I haven't got a chance of even making it to the longlist, with two judges with Labour loyalties who would LOATHE me for my BNP associations.

It should be noted that the Orwell Prize has never awarded its blogging prize to anyone who is not obviously a liberal (unless they are gay, as in the case of last year's Graeme Archer (described at the Orwell Prize website as a "civilly-partnered vegetarian Tory who ... writes on the ConservativeHome website, about Tory politics and London life mainly"), and it is widely known that the Conservative Party is no longer Conservative since 2002 when Theresa May and her ilk took over and started being nice to Slut Single Mums).

I am prepared to have sex with a woman too, if that would  help.   If Suzanne is interested in having sex with me, she should get in touch, or she may wish to give me the name of an attractive feminist friend of hers for me to have sex  with.

A metaphor of the corruption of female promiscuity on the morals of men?

Film critic, photographer, writer. Books include Suckers (vampires), Stiff Lips (ghosts), The Ex (ghosts) & monographs about The Thing & Let the Right One In.

Sex doll.

Sex doll perfectly represents the corruption of female promiscuity.

No, I don't think so.

What made you retweet that image then?

It's a photo I took of a sex doll covered with rubber swamp creatures. That is all.

I just *love* it.

It seems very symbolic and rather artistic.

You must be trying to tell us something if you bought yourself a sex doll, put creepy crawlies over it, and took photo of that!

Didn't buy myself sex doll. Was given it (mid-70s, when I took pic) by gay friends, as a joke. Already had the swamp creatures.

If you think that image is about female promiscuity being corrupting, I reckon that says more about you than about the image.

Well, it is a very potent image and can be interpreted in more than one way. Anyway, female promiscuity *is* corrupting.

What does thinking that that photo is about female promiscuity say about me?

A sex doll says: "Any man can pick me up and use me any way he likes. He doesn't even have to wash me after use."

Everyone's interpretation of imagery is personal. It's not for me to analyse your interpretation; you can do that if you want.

Curious about what you think my interpretation of your photo says about me as you were saying it says something about me!

Monday, 6 February 2012

"There is a rotten apple, Jim, right at the top of the tree."
John Hurt talks about Tinker Tailor,_Tailor,_Soldier,_Spy

"There is a rotten apple, Jim, right at the top of the tree."

It seems to me that John Le Carre was trying to say something about women, all those years ago.  The words are chilling and sinister and sent a shiver down my spine.  It ought to send a shiver down men's spines too, but most young men these days would only display puzzlement and then indifference.  They wouldn't get it at all, you see.

Some forms of gangrene makes the affected limb go numb.   Ignore it (because you no longer feel any pain) and you will DIE.

Gangrene Symptoms
Dry gangrene:
The affected area becomes cold and numb.
Initially, the affected area becomes red.
Then, it develops a brown discoloration.
Finally, it becomes black and shriveled.

A fish rots from the head down. explains.   

Sunday, 5 February 2012

What is a slut?

How many men do you have to shag before you become a slut?

I an actually OK about sluts.  Most of my white British female friends are sluts, I suspect.  If by "slut" we mean a woman who has extramarital sex with men not her husband then I think an overwhelming number of the female population of Britain are indeed sluts.

The difference between a slut and a Slut Single Mum is the difference between being a suspected criminal and a convicted criminal.  

I am only interested in convicted criminals and therefore sluts (ie women who have extramarital sex with men not their husbands) who do not have illegitimate offspring fall under my radar.   

I do not criticise those of you who have a healthy sex life with men not your husbands.  I only criticise those of you got knocked up and went on to have your illegitimate offspring.   As long as this is clear.

Of course, the more men you sleep around with and the more regularly you have sex with them, the more likely you are to become a Slut Single Mum and thereby attract criticism.

How to discourage Slut Single Mummery while still allowing sex to stay cheap

  1. Legalise brothel-keeping.
  2. Make a rule that Slut Single Mothers will always be treated as lower than working prostitutes who pay their taxes.   
I like to think that it will only be a matter of time before my political genius is recognised.   

Saturday, 4 February 2012

The male demand for sex robots and what it says about women

Suddenly, I realise why Onanism was considered a sin ...

I wonder if one of my white nationalist FB friends is going to suggest that the sex robot was invented by a Jew ....

We should note that it is men who want female sex robots. Is there a MALE sex robot?

If so, it would doubtless have "harder", "faster", "deeper" buttons for the female user to press, as well as a "chat" one for after. Listen, guys, if the woman is chatting away incessantly to you after you have had your orgasm, it means she has not had hers. If she has had hers she would be in the same kind of soporific stupor you are in too. 

Thought you might like to know that.

The report also never mentioned how you would have to clean them after use.

Do they get, er, "filled up" completely after regular use? Would you have to change them like a Hoover bag?

I suppose these female robots would all be submissive ones. It wouldn't make sense to have a dominatrix robot, would it? I imagine a human female would be just obviously so much better at talking to you in that way that men who like to be dominated would expect a dominatrix to do...

So what does this say about male sexuality?

I think it says that men prefer to have sex with women who are submissive.

Since most schoolgirls are already sexually experienced by the time they reach the age of consent, I can imagine them making unflattering comparisons of their current male sex partner with their many previous ones. This phenomenon of sluttish schoolgirls probably adequately explains why so many men are now paedophiles.

Women should therefore pretend sexual inexperience and let the man do all the work.  If he does not perform adequately, refrain from saying things like "My last boyfriend made me come three times before he even started getting going, while it is clear that you suffer from premature ejaculation.  This really is not good enough and I am giving you notice of my dissatisfaction."

It is more fun for them if they have to ask for a blowjob than to have one given to them unasked.

If a woman makes all the moves, they would feel somewhat redundant and superfluous and their minds wander off as they stare at the ceiling and mentally tick off their to do list.

"It is very difficult knowing what sort of expression I should have on my face when I am being ridden like a horse ... " - these are very girly preoccupations that now preoccupy the emasculated white male ...

Friday, 3 February 2012

If women ruled the world

Why is Woman's Hour promoting immorality AKA sluttery and bastardy?

Single Mums v Single Dads
As the Office of National Statistics reveals the number of single parent families in the UK tipping two million for the first time why does a single dad invariably still attract greater social sympathy than single mum? Jenni is joined by Benjamin Mee, whose own experience of being a single dad is played by Matt Damon in the forthcoming film ‘We bought a Zoo’ and by Maria Roberts, author of ‘Single Mother on the Verge’.

‘Single Mother on the Verge’ ISBN: 978-0-141-03777-6 is written by Maria Roberts, published by Penguin Books.

Maria Roberts is a Slut Single Mum complaining about how much better-treated single fathers are compared to Slut Single Mums.

Haven't the feminists delighted us for long enough?

Why do these women want to destroy Western civilisation and the white race?

Why are white men so pathetically helpless against these sirens?

Is it because their women control them in the same way pimps control prostitutes by getting them hooked on drugs?

If sex is a drug then women are the drug dealers or suppliers, if you prefer.

If the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world then the world is being ruled by the Slut Single Mum.  Her low moral standards are made worse by her inability to engage in rational and civilised discourse as well as her proven capacity to lower the morals of the rest of her society, destroy the quality of the next generation and therefore the future of your nation.

The lower the morals of women the lower the morals of men.

What is feminism but a legal right for women to fuck whom they like without fear of the consequences, at the expense of the usually male taxpayer who are now  mere women with penis extensions too afraid of challenging the status quo?

Feminism is a cancer.

Drastic and immediate surgery is required.  

Thursday, 2 February 2012

Sir George Young a fine example of a cowardly Conservative CUNT

'It's an outrage!' Woman MPs up in arms at beer called 'Top Totty' for sale in Parliament bar

Read more:

Triumph of the matriarchy: subjugated male MPs eat SHIT and drink PISS. Sir George Young GROVELS, cuts off his dick and serves it to feminazis for TEA.

Sir George Young - the cowardly Conservative cunt who cuts off own dick and serves it to feminazis for tea

Top Totty Blonde Beer - put a burkha on her?

Sex, Feminism and Emasculation

Why is it so hard for white people to get that sex, if indulged in promiscuously and unwisely, can both ruin your life and your civilisation in the short and long term?

Having too much sex with too many people makes you stupid, depraved and degenerate.

Feminists want men to be stupid so they can control them.  In fact, they need men to be more stupid than women in order to control them, and that would have to be very very stupid indeed.  Bribing men with sex is as easy as bribing children with sweets.  That is why men these days are mostly infantilised, easily frightened and passive.   Perhaps that is why the female-dominated teaching profession have deliberately messed up the education system in the West.

If it a feminist conspiracy this is understandable.  But how much worse it is if these feminists have done all these things unwittingly and unconsciously.

Either way, they have delighted us for quite along enough.

It is not hard to defeat them once men wise up to the perniciousness of feminism and the irrationality and illogicality of the thought processes of feminists.

Men are after all stronger than women and capable of thinking more rationally.

Women too can be brought to see sense.  If you conducted a poll amongst the mothers of toddlers in Britain, you will find that most do not want to work as well as look after their young children.

If that is the case, then there is even a democratic case for ending feminism, which can only be propped up by totalitarian legislation such as the Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts (now consolidated in the Equality Act).

Feminism can be fatal to your civilisation because it makes speaking the truth illegal if anyone is offended.  We all know how easily offended women are, don't we?  Have these feminists never heard of the Ugly Truth?  Obviously not, or, if they have, they have forgotten it in their matriarchal dementia.

When you are no longer allowed to speak what you feel to be the the truth then you no longer have free speech.

When you no longer have free speech you live in a totalitarian state.

Are you too stupid to notice or too emasculated to protest?  Then shame on you and your race and your nation and your civilisation, which will soon be an extinct irrelevance

A race whose men are too afraid to criticise the worst of their women does not deserve to survive and will not survive.

Who are the worst of their women?  The ones who make bad reproductive choices - the ones who have illegitimate children and the ones who have disabled children (or both) and then complain they cannot cope, no matter how much help is given to them by the state.

The ones that come to mind are Riven Vincent (who knew 13 years ago that she had MS and then gave birth to a daughter who is severely disabled who is now 7) and Mrs Nickly Clark, who today tweeted:

mrsnickyclark nicky clark
I'm asking for the hate speech laws be amended to include disabled people.Obviously this is of NO consequence to my Tory MP or his party.

"Nicola Clark is the mother to two girls, both disabled, and a campaigner on the issue of promoting positive attitudes towards disabled people" it says on her byline.  How strange that she would think that carrying on in the way she does would promote positive attitudes towards the disabled when anyone with any sense would know that her actions do precisely the opposite and in fact promote and incite hatred and resentment against disabled people.

Perhaps the secret plan of these leftist subversives is to provoke us into saying things that offend disabled people and then throw us into prison for our thoughtcrime/hate speech offence.  Perhaps Mrs Nicky Clark is an agent provocateur ...

Read this, understand this, absorb this and pass it on, if you are not too emasculated to dare and not too apathetic to care.   

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

Feminism is Communism. The Red is not UNDER your bed, she is ON YOUR BED

Men are helpless against this scourge because feminism bribes them with cheap sex and easy women.

Feminism emasculates men by making it OK for them to be stupid, irrational, emotional and self-pitying - just like women.

If sex is a drug then women are the SUPPLIERS.   The first few fucks are always free, and then you are HOOKED.

Women supply men with sex to CONTROL them.

Probably, the blowjob was invented by a woman (probably a mother) to make her crying infant son shut the fuck up.

Men are now infantilised because bribing men with sex is like bribing children with sweets.    

How to defeat Left Liberalism

Defeat Feminism, which is the Foundation and Source of stupid toxic cancer-causing Left Liberal Commie Pinko ideas.

No violence is required, only the use of Reason and Logic.  We all know most women, and, increasingly, more men nowadays who have been feminised and emasculated by Feminism, are in fact incapable of understanding and using these concepts to their advantage and will only end up having hissy fits about how offended they are with you and how evil you must be for upsetting them with the expression of your views.

  1. Make the case that men and women who "reason" with their emotions should be disenfranchised.
  2. Make the case that those who pay no taxes should have no vote, instantly disenfranchising slut single mums who are a burden on the state together with their offspring, who in most cases are useless criminal sluts and bastards who breed the next generation of useless criminal sluts and bastards at the expense of the non-slut and non-bastard section of the population who have jobs and pay taxes and are productive.