Thursday, 28 July 2011

British mothers so SHIT now they don't even teach their children their own names

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363022/Children-start-school-knowing-open-book-word-stop-says-Camerons-poverty-adviser.html

 'E don't talk to me so I don't talk to 'im', 


said one of the mothers interviewed, of her baby.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/toda​y/hi/today/newsid_9550000/​9550213.stm

0810 Why do some children go to school not even knowing their own name? Neil Wilson, executive head teacher of Newall Green High School, tells Sanchia Berg about the scale of the problem and the government's communication champion for children Jean Gross, explains what the government is doing to tackle the issue.




Stupider and stupider the white British are getting, and it is all because shit feminists dare not say anything against shit for brains shit single mums and the shit for brains shit for guts government that tolerates this SHIT.


Bet the BNP men are too shit scared to tell their own women off. Bet they still want to attract the female vote, which includes the shit single mums who don't teach their children their own name.

The lower the morals of the women, the lower the morals of the men, and the more shit for brains the entire race becomes, because sluts will go forth and multiply with bastards at taxpayers' expense, the spawn of the stupid mated with the poor, the degraded with the depraved.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5056489/Nearly-half-of-children-born-out-of-wedlock-official-figures-show.html


"Among British-born mothers the proportion of babies born out of wedlock is likely to be above the landmark 50 per cent already"


The entire country will become a fucking RETARD, probably well BEFORE I am dead.

Breivik not quite a racist, whatever you think of him


He actually hated the Norwegian Labour Party more than he hated Muslims, and knew exactly what he was doing. If he was going to kill people, he felt he should kill those he thought most responsible for his grievance.

So there you go: Breivik wasn't a racist. A racist would have killed people of another race because he hated them. He killed people of his own race he felt were most to blame: the members of the Norwegian Labour Party, who let the Muslim immigrants in.  

Probably, he secretly admired them and despised his own people and their matriarchal self-abnegating culture of Free Love and slut women.   Interesting. 



Breivik did, however, note that he doesn’t hate Muslims in any fashion and that “I have had several Muslim friends over the years, some of which I still respect.”

Thursday, 14 July 2011

BNP *not* prepared to promote family values supported by marriage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-parent

Expelled BNP member:

"Claire, they will not promote family values because there are probably more unmarried parents in the BNP than there are in the Labour Party (even Red Ed made an honest woman of the mother of his children eventually). A neighbouring branch had difficulty finding candidates at election time, because so many of its male members were not on the electoral register, due to their 'partners' claiming to be single mothers, when in actual fact these men lived with their 'partners' & kids." 

It was on the word of a single mother with disabled offspring that caused my suspension which eventually led to my expulsion.

I wonder what John Tyndall would have thought of this state of affairs, and of a nationalist party led by men who are too afraid to be seen to be uncompromisingly promoting family values supported by marriage because they wish to attract the fickle, unprincipled female vote by acts of unmasculine surrender rather than using reason and arguments to appeal to the rest of the populace.

If only the BNP would acknowledge that without the reconsecration of the institutions of marriage and family, the white race will continue on its downward slide into decline, degradation, dementia and barbarism while the Muslims, whom they hate and fear and who are not afraid to promote family values supported by marriage, will always do better than they.

But if they are now too addicted to their welfare and cheap women that they cannot and do not wish to extricate themselves from this downward trajectory, then there is not much to be said and done.

"God does not change the lot of those who do not change what is in their hearts." 

Unconscious and pregnant

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b012fs67#synopsis

Pregnant 35 year old woman has cardiac arrest.   Strenuous and officious efforts were made to keep her alive.  Husband apparently not consulted about how he would cope with an invalid wife and an infant son.

In the event wife dies soon after child delivered by Caesarian section.

Did anyone notice how female-dominated this programme was? Did anyone ask the husband what he thought? If I were him, I would have told the doctors to let her go. I would rather start again with a healthy wife than have to bring up a son all by myself.


If I had been that husband's mother, I would have told him what to do about his daughter-in-law.  


I wonder how much the whole exercise cost the NHS.  The programme is of course silent on this sort of thing.  

'Cock/Prick-teasers' now victimise men with impunity


Slut walk protests and the impact on men

Two months ago a Toronto police officer's advice to women not to dress like 'sluts' if they wanted to avoid sexual attack prompted protests across the World. Slut walks protests started and more of the scantily clad demonstrations are now planned for the summer in cities such as Norwich and Leeds. They’ve divided women on whether they’re the best way of tackling sexual violence. But what’s their impact on men? Jenni is joined by the lawyer Nick Freeman and Tom Deadman, student and volunteer activist with The White Ribbon Campaign.


It is strange how the term 'cockteaser' and 'prickteaser' seems to have passed out of the entire male consciousness.   Nick Freeman was surely old enough to have heard of the term.

I thought this rather Orwellian, frankly, or perhaps they didn't quite dare say the word in front of Dame Jenni for fear of the consequences. 


Perhaps the male equivalent of doing this would be to get a woman to propose to you, say "Yes, yes, yes!" and then change your mind at the last minute after she has sent out the invitations and bought herself a wedding dress.



Thursday, 7 July 2011

Nationalism should promote Family Values supported by Marriage and challenge Feminism

How very odd that the white nationalists I have been in communication with do not even grasp the connection between race and nation and the desecration of the institutions of marriage and family by decades of feminism.


It is perfectly obvious to me that widespread fatherlessness means more fatherlessness and more single motherhood, but not to them. Without two parents, no culture worth speaking of will be passed on to the next generation, and fatherlessness and single motherhood will continue to spread like a cancer.

You will find that if you search "family" at http://communications.bnp.org.uk/ge2010manifesto.pdf you will find no reference to family values at all.

Asians, with their abhorrent practice of honour killing at least see to it that the children they have brought up do not take up with members of the opposite sex that they disapprove of lightly and wantonly.

They, with their family networks, thrive and easily overtake the indigenous in wealth, education and status while the indigenous fuck themselves silly, drink themselves silly and drug themselves silly and produce the next generation who will do more of the same.

In a more rational age, white parents would disown and disinherit children of theirs who do things they feel have betrayed their values or disgraced the family, but no longer.

To make the heretical suggestion that white parents take responsibility for the quality of their offspring will make them quail and quake  and shudder and shake.

Instead, they compete with each other to be more pathetic, disabled, illegitimate, illiterate, innumerate and helpless to gain the most state benefits, and this with the connivance of the BNP, who are supposed to represent the interests of the white race.

If the BNP did not prevent me from being their 2012 London mayoral candidate for reasons of race then they prevented me from doing so because they were frightened of alienating the female vote, just like the LibLabCon, because what I said about what I would do with my severely disabled baby offended a BNP mother who is an unwed single mother with disabled offspring herself.

The reason why the white man is in his current degraded state is because of decades of chasing the female vote. That is why Britain is now so irrational, hysterical, promiscuous, vindictive, hypocritical and cowardly. But the BNP want more of the same in their great nation, apparently, just without non-white people in it.

Let us see how far they will get as they will the end but not the means, a female vice.

Wishing to wound but being afraid to strike is yet another.

Burying one's head in the sand is a dangerous thing though. When one thinks of someone with their head in the ground and his bottom in the air, certain undignified images and possibilities come to mind.

But who am I to even attempt to overturn such a long and ignoble British tradition of hypocrisy and cowardice - I , a mere female and a foreigner?

I am no one at all.

Monday, 4 July 2011

The hand that rocks the cradle belongs to a slut single mum with disabled offspring

The elephant in the room is no longer immigration, it is the never-married mother and her illegitimate offspring, who, these days, is also probably disabled. 


That I am no longer mayoral candidate is directly related to the offence a female BNP member took against my views about the disabled and the unwed single mother. She is a single mother who has disabled offspring.
 
You know who is in power by the ones you cannot criticise.
 
If Britain is a nation ruled by promiscuous unwed mothers who are bad mothers to both their able-bodied and their disabled children, then you ought to fear for the future. You ought to fear because the values that these women embody are the ones that rule this nation ie stupidity, cowardice, ignorance, hypocrisy, promiscuity, fecklessness, short-termism, vindictiveness, denial, hysteria and irrationality verging on the insane.
 
So there you are, effeminate, fearful, soon to be pauperised "men" and mice of Britain.


Wot you gonna do? "Suspend" me from the nearest lamp-post? (Pun intended.)
 
The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. She who rules the Western world is a promiscuous slut of a single mother with a litter of bastards by different men.


So put that in your pipe and smoke it, gentlemen.

Oh, but you can't because the women have banned smoking both in the home and in public.

Friday, 1 July 2011

I cannot attend a meeting of prospective mayoral candidates because I have been been suspended from the BNP

On 27 June, I received an email stating :




"It's my duty to inform you that as a result of your cyber activities, you have been reported to the executive disciplinary committee for bringing the party into disrepute."




On the same day I received a notice of my suspension which means I cannot attend any meetings, and in particular the meeting at which prospective mayoral candidates will be selected. It states:



"Your membership of the British National Party has been suspended, pending an investigation into alleged serious breaches of the BNP Code of Conduct. 

While suspended you may not take part in any Party event, attend meetings or send circulars that give the impression that you hold any position within the Party. You are required to fully comply with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Party constitution.

Failure to comply with these requirements could result in your expulsion from membership of the Party, and Civil or Criminal proceedings being taken against you.

You will be informed of the outcome of the investigation in due course."
I asked:

"Do I have the right to defend myself and be told what I am accused of?"

The response I received:


"We are in the investigatory period at the moment. We will keep you informed of developments."


I guess the answer is "No" then.


It was the former North East Organiser Chez Dunn who reported my comments on the Facebook wall of Charlotte Lewis, another former BNP organiser who is now also suspended pending an investigation.


Charlotte and I were expressing surprise and disappointment at how few nationalists now appear to believe in family values. She also agreed with me that if she were to have a severely disabled baby, she would not wish to bring it up either and agreed with my solution, which was to dispose of it myself ie commit infanticide, if the midwife would not dispose of it for us. This was indeed common practice as evidenced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwifery#Early_Historical_Perspective


"After the delivery, the midwife made the initial call on whether or not an infant was healthy and fit to rear. She inspected the newborn for congenital deformities and testing its cry to hear whether or not it was robust and hearty. Ultimately, midwives made a determination about the chances for an infant’s survival and likely recommended that a newborn with any severe deformities be exposed."



Ms Dunn is herself a single mother with disabled offspring. She threatened to maim and kill me on her Facebook wall in the following terms on Saturday 25 June 2011 at 12:31:


"If anyone wants to take a screenie, tell Claire that when I get my hands on her it won't be my children that are born disabled, she will be the disabled one and lets see if her husband wants to care for a drain on society or if he would have her put down. What a cheeky slut. I will kill the bitch."


The disabled are electorally insignificant, and what I said did not threaten them in any way.


All I said was that I would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby, and would not wish to pass the cost of the care of such a child to the taxpayer, so if the midwife would not do it for me, I would have to commit infanticide. This is because I know it would not have much of a life if I passed it like a parcel to the uncertain kindness of strangers and to carers who do not care, but instead neglect, bully and abuse their charges as was seen at Winterbourne Vew in Panorama recently.


This however now translates into the defamatory claim that "Claire Khaw wants to kill all disabled people."


I believe some members would rather have a white candidate polling fewer votes than an ethnic member attracting more votes and reminded of members of the Chinese Communist Party who said they would rather have the weeds of communism than the fruits of capitalism.


Do I regret what I said about what I would do with my own severely disabled baby? No, because what I said was the truth that most Britons would admit, if they were not drowning in their own cowardice and hypocrisy in the way a heroin addict might be drowning in his own vomit.


Four men have privately admitted that if they were presented with a baby as severely disabled as Riven Vincent's Celyn, they would have it smothered too. It is quite understandable that they would not wish to keep a child like that out of taxed income. It is unlikely, however, that Riven Vincent's husband has much taxed income to speak of from the sound of things at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jun/09/disability-cuts-mumsnet-david-cameron


Celyn's father, Mark Williams, makes sure he is home from work every day at the same time she returns from school. Riven has had multiple sclerosis for 13 years, and three years ago began using a wheelchair outside the house, and a stick to get around inside, making her doubly sensitive to changes in government policy that affect disabled people. As a result her husband does more than 50% of the caring for Celyn. A research scientist, he works part-time, fitting his hours around Celyn's school timetable. "He worked full time until she was two or three, and then it just became too hard," Riven says.



By suspending me and preventing me from becoming mayoral candidate and thereby punishing me for what I said, it does rather suggest that they would rather endorse the lifestyle choices of Riven Vincent and Chez Dunn than criticise them, even when it is pretty clear that so many decades of condoning the bad reproductive choices of white British women is the cause of Britain's decline. That is why the stupid breed with the poor, producing the feeble-minded, morally destitute feeble-bodied populace we now have. The British are now more accurately described as "dipso, fatso, bingo, Tesco, ASBO and paedo", and that is why the foreigners keep coming to do the jobs that the locals are no longer capable of doing, and that is why they don't want to integrate. They don't want to integrate because they don't want their daughters becoming single mothers and they don't want their sons to be divorced homeless losers who have lost contact with his children because his ex-wife has decided it doesn't suit her to have him around.

I really cannot see how encouraging more white women to behave like Riven Vincent and Chez Dunn would improve the quality and future of the white race, but I guess the BNP are not really into advocating unpopular solutions, and prefer to continue blaming foreigners for all their ills.


It is a great shame really, that a party formed for the purpose of promoting the interests of white people should so unthinkingly support one of their own rather than another who is not of their race, but who has stuck her neck out for them in the face of predictable vilification by the liberal establishment.


Still, if they want to discipline me and expel me for saying what most white people are too afraid to say and prevent me from attending a meeting at which I could be selected as mayoral candidate, then the way ahead is clear for me.


I can just pack my bags and go home and leave white people to choke on their own vomit of hypocrisy and cowardice, while poor, promiscuous and stupid white people continue to have more illegitimate and disabled children (with the encouragement of the BNP) and wonder why their country is going to the dogs and Muslims.


http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=151 has a poll in which you are invited to decide whether I would attract more votes than a white candidate for the 2012 London mayoral candidate.



NB: The question is not whether you want me to become the BNP mayoral candidate because I am your Facebook friend or because you think it would be quite entertaining, but whether you actually believe I would attract significantly more votes than the other candidates.