Tuesday, 27 January 2009
I really cannot see how it would affect Sky one way or another if it broadcasts the Gaza Appeal. The reason given for not broadcasting it is that Sky is, like the BBC, international.
It does not make sense, since the rest of the world is anti-Israeli and anti-Zionist anyway.
MPs slam BBC and Sky over Gaza snub
Monday, 26 January 2009
He now lives in Oxford with his wife Jane Blumberg, an American academic, whom he married in 1987.
Maybe he doesn't want to be a victim of FemiNazi legislation which will give him no quarter.
for the effect of divorce on men
His "rigorous" interviewer, John Humphrys, on the Today Programme did not ask the crucial question: "May I know your wife's views on Gaza?"
Robert Burns 1788
Curs'd be the man, the poorest wretch in life,
The crouching vassal to a tyrant wife!
Who has no will but by her high permission,
Who has not sixpence but in her possession;
Who must to he, his dear friend's secrets tell,
Who dreads a curtain lecture worse than hell.
Were such the wife had fallen to my part,
I'd break her spirit or I'd break her heart;
I'd charm her with the magic of a switch,
I'd kiss her maids, and kick the perverse bitch.
Sunday, 25 January 2009
You obviously would not know me, but I used to be part of the UKMM. I set up the campaign M.A.F.R.A. Men Against False Rape Allegations. This campaign proved more successful in the USA than it did over here.
This campaign was mainly designed to help the innocent men and their families, who became subjects of wrongful allegations of rape. I started such a campaign in 1996 -1998 then proceeded to study GCSE Law in my local college. I started studying in 1999 & 2000. Funnily enough , I was "given" the same grades "D" even though in 1999, I was informed I would easily obtain a "B" Grade. This went through into the following year. I became highly suspicious when I had the same grading for 2000.
I then enrolled onto the Access to Higher Education course from 2001 -2003. In the first year, my course tutor suggested I should do an I.T. degree, instead of studying towards a Law degree. The second year, the course tutor suggested I should do a bricklaying course, instead of studying towards a Law degree. Does it not seem unfair to add that from 1999 -2003, I was unfairly marked, discriminated by a college that knew I was wrongfully accused of rape, and intended to study Law. Such a college prevented me from moving on in life, and so destroying my future. The local Job Centre even supports me, when I was interviewed by the D.E.A . Disability Employment Advisor. I became physically assaulted, thus now on Incapacity Benefit. If I had a Law degree, I had the chance of a job in Firenze ( Florence ) Italy. I am now waiting to be assessed to see if I can train as a lifeguard, if not, then I will move out of my town, and try elsewhere.
Such typical cases of those who faced conviction;or found innocent, but please note who they are, and where or what they obtained in their lifetimes.
DR. MYRA HINDLEY ( Moors Murders) R.v.Hindley (1969)
Myra Hindley died with the title of Doctorate Degree through the Open University. The O.U. does go through local colleges for students. She studied Humanities.
Patrick McGee. R.v.McGee (1984)
Conservative Party Brighton Bombing. Patrick McGee left prison with a Phd. If you recall the I.R.A Brighton party bombings , then this man was convicted for such.
Louise Woodward ( The U.S.A. Baby shaking case)
I believe she eventually studied towards her law degree. Louise was never convicted, but she became a victim of long term threats.
My case: R.v.Tovey ( 1994 )
I was wrongfully accused of raping a psychiatric patient, whom I never even touched. I was placed into prison on 5 February-25 February 1994, and on the 18th April 1994, I was eliminated by DNA.
This is how innocent men are treated by such feminists. It seems good to say, that not all women are the same. I don't believe in God, but if one does exist, then I am glad he did not discriminate when the Tsunami took place.
email from Anthony Tovey
23 January 2009
My name is Peter van de Voorde from Australian radio program
DADS ON THE AIR, http://www.dadsontheair.net/
I understand you would like to find out more about fathers' groups.
I am a little curious as to which fathers groups you are referring to when you refer to them as "odd"? [My email to a men's rights contact explained that I wanted to form an opinion about how they are and what they do. "I know they are perceived to be quite odd", I said, "so I would like to see for myself."]
With a little searching, you will note that almost every fathers group in the world, fits into your "angry fathers group" category. Why is this so, you might ask? The answer is very simple.
With few exceptions, they are responsible fathers who strongly resist the forcible removal of their children from their love, care and protection, by State sponsored agencies, institutions and bureaucracies against their will. Most have not only lost their children, but also their homes and are emotionally and economically ruined by the experience.
They are not just angry, they are absolutely outraged and wouldn't be human if they weren't. Not if/but when the community finally learns of the horrific ramifications of these Government sponsored human rights abuses, they will be horrified and heads will certainly roll.
However it will be too late for the many millions of helpless children and their non-custodial parents around the world, whose lives have been destroyed by the current draconian family laws, which belong to the Orwellian State.
If these atrocities were committed against any other minority group, there would be a universal outcry, yet we hear very little from those that are in a position of power, to bring relief to the victims. A multi-million dollar industry flourishes unchallenged, while our communities bleed and are torn apart.
I have yet to find one responsible person, who has had their children forcibly removed from their care, speak out against shared parenting.
Yet I have found many who have never had this traumatic experience forced upon them, yet are ready to join in and espouse the diatribe against fathers and shared parenting. With a little searching however, you will find that most of those that engage in persecuting these unfortunate fathers and their children, have/or are in fact profiteering from the human misery they are inflicting.
What they fail to realize is the fact that these persecuted and stereo typed fathers, have mothers, sisters, daughters, and many new partners who are also horrified at what is happening to their loved ones. Many are starting to speak out in support, and it is no longer a question of if/ but when the tide will turn.
Shoulder to shoulder they stand in defense of their human rights and those of their children. History will see them as heroes not as "deadbeats". Against all the odds they have shown remarkable bravery, great courage and strength of character.
This is in sharp contrast to their persecutors who, motivated by greed, power and malice, think nothing of abusing the human rights of other members of the human family.
Separated fathers are caught between a rock and a hard place when they are denied contact with their children:
If they stand and fight for their human rights, they are labeled as an Angry, Abusive, and Dangerous Thug, not worthy of contact with his children.
If they walk away they are labeled, as an Uncaring, Deadbeat who Abandoned his kids, and is therefore not worthy of contact with his children.
The worse human rights abuses in history were all once legal, the one currently waged against fathers is no exception.
Fathers are not odd, it is the distorted community perceptions that are odd.
I hope this information is of some help in clarifying the position that modern day fathers unfortunately find themselves in.
Peter van de Voorde
Presenter, Reseacher and Co-producer
DADS ON THE AIR, AUSTRALIA
+61 4286 48691
25 January 2009
Sunday, 18 January 2009
Since I am certain it will be deleted, I will set it out below:
Because the laws in the West encourage it in the name of feminism, which no man is allowed to question, or he will end up losing his home, half his property and access to his children while having to pay for them until they are 18.
The West is also The Land of Bastards, Bastardy, Welfare Claimants and High Crime, ruled by the ideology of Feminazism whose Sacred Cow is Single Motherhood (which includes Divorced Mothers as well as Never Married Mothers).
Successive governments dare not address the harm caused by single parenthood because that would be tantamount to blaspheming against Sexual Freedom Without Responsibility, a deity every Westerner is expected to worship unquestioningly.
Primary schoolchildren are prepared for Sex Worship (in the form of Sex Education). As soon as they are in secondary school, they will be shown how to do it, and handed contraceptives at regular intervals, to encourage them to do it.
In the UK, girls under 16 can get contraceptives through their doctors and pharmacies, who are not obliged to inform their parents.
Single mothers, as we all know, are the ones who are most busily breeding the next generation of under-achievers, prostitutes, criminals and welfare claimants.
[As proof of this proposition that you cannot blaspheme against Single Mothers and Feminism, you will see this answer briefly, then it will be deleted by the Yahoo Guardians of Political Correctness, on grounds of causing offence to Single Mothers and the Illegitimate, who now make up about half the population.]